Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Poking the eye from Zion

Maldives is one of the two 100% Muslim countries in the world. Maldives being an Islamic State never criticize the oldest terrorist movement in the world. Maybe it is because we vote “yes” on the resolution 181 and supported the declaration to rip off Palestinian’s land from them and to give it to the Jews. Our maybe we never got our true independence from the British monarchy and still bow down to the queen as we are her “common wealth”. Any how we are ashamed to call ourselves Muslims, to practice it and even to raise our voices in defense of our brothers. What a nation we are!!!

The bloody, racist and brutal Zionist Movement. Which they call Israel is well known for their blood thirsty prejudice against the whole world as if they are the “god’s chosen children”, and the rest of the world is their play ground.

Maldives being a small country with a very few natural resources, is subjected to a lot of pressure from other countries. Yet we have never asked for the Zionist for any help nor did they offer us anything before. Why are they offering help now? What are we offering in return?

This bloody thirsty terrorist group of Israel not only has attacked countries criticizing them, but their very friendly America also in different occasions had to suffer their plots, like the “Lavon affaire” the attack on USS liberty and the famous Pollard spy case. Israel committed more than 60 massacres against Lebanon, Syria, and Pelastine from 1946 to 1999. The attacks and brutal force have not stopped. We are all aware of how they treated the democratically elected Hamas government. Israel is the only UN recognized nation which have defied the UN resolutions, from 1948 to 2009, 255 resolutions have been passed against the terrorist nation of Israel and none which Israel complied with. While their Allied America vetos anything that might harm the poor “holocaust survivors”.

I just wonder why on earth the Arabs have to pay the bloody money for Germany’s crimes and give the Jews their land. Not only that how come Europe expelled Jews out. From the First Crusade of 1096, the expulsion from England in 1290, the Spanish Inquisition, the expulsion from Spain in 1492, the expulsion from Portugal in 1497, various pogroms, the Dreyfus Affair, and perhaps the most infamous, the Holocaust in Nazi Germany.

Jews been hated by most of the world while Muslims were very kind to them. Leon Poliakov writes, During early Islam, Jews enjoyed great privileges, and their communities prospered. There was no legislation or social barriers preventing them from conducting commercial activities. Many Jews migrated to areas newly conquered by Muslims and established communities there. The vizier of Baghdad entrusted his capital with Jewish bankers. The Jews were put in charge of certain parts of maritime and slave trade. Siraf, the principal port of the caliphate in the 10th century, had a Jewish governor. And even when they were persecuted by most of the states of Europe the Turkish and Palestinian Arabs helped them and this is how they repay them.

They follow their book very well when they read “"Destroy all of the land; beat down their pillars and break their statues and waste all of their high places, cleansing the land and dwelling in it, for I have given it to you for a possession" Numbers 33:52,53 so this is what the vicious barbarous Israel is practicing.

With all this blood and shame Israel offering to help Maldivians why?? Why not help the people Israel have oppressed for more than half a century? Why not give Palestinian hospitals some proper equipments and medication. They have every inch of their hospitals full of victims suffering from crimes committed by Israel, their doctors have to conduct emergency procedures while the patient is on the hospital floor. So why is the “eye from Zion” visiting us??

Israeli surgeons have been prosecuted in Ukraine for harvesting organs and elsewhere in the world, so how on earth can we trust these people to help our nation. I’m ready to give my eyes, both of them, if it would stop the crimes committed against our brothers and sisters in Palestine and I’m sure each and every Muslim in our proud nation will be most willing to offer their eyes to end this torture on Palestine. Unfortunately it’s not the case so we don’t want anything from the terrorist group older than Al- Qaeda and crueler than Adolf Hitler.

If America is so kind to the Jews why don’t you give your land which you have plenty, just don’t dump your rubbish in our yard.

Occupation 101 and waltz with basher might open the eye of those who are sleeping and supporting this blood thirsty beast.



Tuesday, September 7, 2010

The so called democracy and freedom.

Democracy: the great system of governing which is derived from the people by the people for the people or is it?

This popular system which is sold to communities in the name of giving back them their power and authority is clearly a misrepresentation of this flawed product.


How can anyone claim that the power is owned by the people and decisions are made by the people when the legislative power is vested on the parliament? The parliament is formed to represent the people and to let their voices be heard. But this is in confliction with the idea of democracy if we say democracy is the authority of the people themselves and no representative working on their behalf. The very existence of the parliament means the absence of the people because the people have no direct participation in this and the masses are represented by a single representative who is to represent more than a thousand citizens, which is obviously impossible. And in most cases the representative is appointed by a party or a coalition of parties limiting the choice for the masses.

Right after the election the representatives take over the sovereignty of the people and act on their behalf even though the fraction of people he/she represent strongly disagree with his/her decisions. Yet it is still called the system of the people and their voices are heard. And it is more horrible when a party wins the majority of the parliament. Even if the result is 52/48 the majority in the parliament would rule over the masses and pass bills upon their ideology thus imposing rules and legislations over the other 48% by force. For the minority 48% this would be a dictatorship. The reason for this is, in this system support of a majority legitimizes anything. This is total madness in the mane of freedom.

The same is on electing a leader the majority will impose a ruler which will be rejected by the minority even though the difference is very little or barely notable. This is the exact situation we have in Maldives. While the so called leader of the people struggles with the so called representatives elected from the people by the people for the people, the masses plunge into some sort of a civil war. If the people elected the leader with their full support and if the people elected the representatives at the parliament with their support how is it possible to have a conflict within these two bodies of governance.

Even If the ruling party or coalition of parties have the majority in the parliament it would still be imposing legislations over that minority by force and that minority would be struggling to break free or to come to power, the result would be an arms struggle or some other mean of power struggle.

How can a rule which its legislative powers are vested on a handful of representatives for the masses be called a system of the people.


In this system of democracy Parties are a modern tool of promoting dictatorship, a party not being an individual is hardly thought to be dictatorial. But the very idea of a party is a group of people sharing the same interests and common perceptions, and their main goal would be to rule over the people as a whole. That means to dictate over the masses. So the very existence of parties in a so called democracy is a sign of a power struggle which will not let another rule peacefully.

If the parties can justify the ideology of a group of people sharing the same idea and goal can and should rule over the masses if they somehow got the opportunity. I believe they have also agreed what Hitler did was legal and by all means justified.

Whatever this is called it’s a cruel system which will keep the poor citizens in frenzy, confusion and provoke them to murder each other while the so called elected leaders and representatives enjoy the show and the wealth of the people.


If I were to give out a solution, I would be on the same line as the dictators, to think that my own idea and philosophy would be good enough to be imposed on the people as a whole and that it should be the governing law.


Thursday, September 2, 2010

كلية الشريعة بالجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة

كلية الشريعة بالجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة

نشأة كلية الشريعة:
تعتبر كلية الشرعية أول كليات الجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة ، حيث أنشئت في نفس السنة التي أنشئت فيها الجامعة في يوم الخامس والعشرين من الشهر الثالث للعام 1381هـ بالأمر السامي رقم ( 11 ) وبدأت الدراسة في 2 / 6/ 1381هـ وبعدد ( 85 طالبا ) ، ثم اخذ هذا العدد في الازدياد حتى بلغ في العام الجامعي 1427هـ / 1428هـ إلى أكثر من 4000طالبا ينتمون إلى أكثر من 165 جنسية .

أهداف كلية الشريعة:
أنشئت كلية الشريعة بالجامعة لتحقيق عدد من الأهداف منها :ـ
1ـ العناية بالفقه الإسلامي وعلومه خصوصا في مجالي التأصيل والاستنباط .
2ـ إعداد الفقهاء والعلماء القادرين على القيام بمهام الفتوى والقضاء والتدريس متضلعين في علوم الشريعة ومقاصدها .
3ـ تكوين الملكة القوية لدى طلابها للقدرة على الاستنباط والاستدلال والبحوث العلمية .
4ـ الوقوف بشكل علمي صحيح ووفق منهج سليم على مقاصد الشريعة وأسرارها مما يساعد على تكوين الدعاة المخلصين الذين يكونون سفراء لبلدانهم .
5ـ العناية بدراسة كتاب الله عز وجل وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم وتنقية العقيدة الإسلامية وتعميقها في النفوس صافية نقية .


Tuesday, March 30, 2010

32 over the majority, what a democracy!!!!!

32 over the majority, what a democracy!!!!!

Mr. Mohammed Nasheed!!!! Are you drugged or just simply crazy?
I agree with you about the reckless troublesome regime we had in the past and the carefully selected words to emphasize their faults and their goals to destruction of this nation. Unfortunately I’m really worried about your sanity and ability to lead this nation in one piece.

I would not accuse you for the actions of the members of MDP, but you must be aware of the cruel unjust spoilt brats working in that party just like the old regime’s ministers and even worse. You would never be considered sane if you keep saying that you have almost tackled the corruption and state organized crimes and discriminations between members of different political parties. While these squeaking foul rats infect the society as if this is a property they inherited. Money laundering, intoxicant and drugs smuggling and shell we not forget the peaceful youth sponsored by the ruling party, in other words government funded THUGS.

Talking about freedom of press, this administration of yours has been addressing this issue as if it’s a right to a certain category of people. While it clearly states in the constitution, freedom of expression shall be within the boundary of Islam and shall not contradict whit the tenets of Islam. While your “science ambassador” Ahmed Moosa would write and even copy past each and every kind of rubbish he gets his hands on, he is not accountable for it nor condemned for going against the constitution. While your supporters spit out the foulest of all, while they mock their very own forefathers and the very heritage of this nation, you, the elected one to protect this nation’s heritage and safe guard its sacred values, are proving yourself ever more unreliable. It is sad very sad that our reporters get hurt and nearly murdered for no reason but who can you blame. After all it was your administration releasing a convicted criminal with records of crimes. Wasn’t that the very reason these staffs of the free media got hurt? When the state funded thugs of “BG” and “kuda henveyru” turns towards the light of God and leave their barbarous ways of life and concentrated in living a more respected life with responsibilities, making your administration lose hope in government organized crimes, Thus releasing convicts out of jail for no reason.

I do support the economical reform you speak of and believe that by reducing our debts and increasing our reserve would lead us to prosper but from what I have seen, I just can’t believe a person suffering from amnesia with a bunch of hungry wolfs in his cabinet can actually achieve that.

Well I don’t think I would totally agree with you on anything except regarding the DRP puppet show, which seems to mimic you with the thought that their leaders getting arrested the public will forget their crimes and they would win the next election. It’s a pity and shame on each and every member of that party. What a joke!!

“On the issue of extremism, allow me to go back four or five years ago. Back then, the ruling regime did not allow political parties, and opposing voices were brutally crushed. The only avenue for dissent was underground religious groups.”
That you are right and allow me to add to that, the lack of explanation and teachings of the true Islamic values to protect the regime worsened it to this level giving birth to a handful of “extremists”.

But it is very disurbing that this administration of yours keeps on protecting them in your very own party. Mr “hafiz” Zaki, Sheykh Fareed, and the Guantanamo convict Mr.Fauzy and Mr. Mazeed the famous leader who managed to convince his students to blow up some tourists, they are protected by your administration and they are used as tools to answer and create division within the very party you have allied with. And yet you have the cheek to talk about extremism.

Have you been brainwashed or drugged by a foreign missionary? If you are a Muslim you are ought to be following its fundamentals or else you would not be considered as a Muslim. This is not Christianity where they circle around a clueless book with no actual reference to any aspect of life and simply no answers to their problems. The liberalism you talk about gave Europe its darkest wars and worse days. No matter how much they try to beautify the unjust and crimes going on there it would be ever more obvious. That liberalism you talk about is now trying to stop the basic right of a person to wear what they see fit if they are to be a citizen of a certain country.

You must be deaf not to hear the criticism towards you by the very majority of the people regarding you and your friends' unislamic, unconstitutional statements and speeches. I’m just surprised to hear that you hear the very minority of those rebellious people who are against the very social fabric and order we have here.

And it’s your stupidity to tell us that these friends of yours asked you to unjustly arrest or censor the free and public loved and respected scholars. Isn’t that a crime to plot against an innocent man? I thought democracy was the voice of the people the majority but it seems 32 young lose poodles would amaze you easily.

“We must defeat the rejectionists, who hanker for a return to authoritarian rule.”
Mr. Nasheed, are your asking your minority supporters to try to crush and win over the majority so that your ideas may prevail?

“And we must win the battle of ideas against extremists who want to replace democracy with theocracy.”
Mr, Nasheed, this is a one nation under the one and only true religion from the one and only true God, “one nation under one God” so if you are trying to bring this "democracy" and to separate state and religion and follow the lost sheeps of Judah that means you are not trying to free these people and let them live, your are trying to enslave them with the worst know type of slavery known to man, Slavery of mind. Muslims believe in a theocracy government just because the old wolfs at Europe failed to conduct a government with an anonymously scribbled book of the Jews and resolved to a secular system which is always proving it’s a failure does not mean we are ought to follow them in to the dark pit.

I don’t know where on earth you get this bollocks and how the hell you expect people to buy this cheap crap you utter
Mr. Nasheed would you stop being a bloody arse moaning like a sick mule!!!


Saturday, March 20, 2010

Islamic fundamentalism

Islamic fundamentalism

It seems some of us are so much deluded they actually don’t know what they are saying, they just take everything they hear or read from the media and spit it out as if each and every crap of it is absolute truth.

What is Islam?

Islam is the religion of Adam, Idris (Enoch), Nuh (Noah), Hud (Eber), Saleh (Salih), Ibrahim (Abraham), Lut (Lot), Isma’il (Ishmael), Is'haq (Isaac), Yaqub (Jacob), Yusuf (Joseph), Ayyub (Job), Shu'ayb (Jethro), Musa (Moses), Harun (Aaron), Dawud (David), Sulayman (Solomon), Ilyas (Elijah), Al-Yasa (Elisha), Yunus (Jonah), Dhul-Kifl (Ezekiel), Zakariyya (Zechariah), Yahya (John the Baptist), Isa (Jesus) and Muhammad
Islam teaches that

1- There is no god truly worthy of worship except Allah and Mohammed is his messenger and slave
2- Quran is the word of Allah, the book sent to guide the people to paradise and everything in it is true, word to word, letter to letter
3- Mohammed is the last prophet and he was sent to show and explain the true guidance and teach the people.

This is the religion that gave woman the right to live peacefully when they were buried alive and when they were inherited within the family as lifeless material. This is the religion that made studying and seeking knowledge a part of worshiping and made people wonder and study and developed. This is the religion that justly ruled from china to Spain peacefully. This is the religion that made people create surgical instruments, first had dental surgeries while in the so called “dark ages” the British and the French washed their mouth with urine to cure dental pain. This religion taught human what human rights are. To make it short those who don’t know Islam or those who have a wrong understanding of Islam due to longtime exposure to nonsense can click here to read more about “what is Islam?

What is fundamentals, fundamentalism?

1- An original or primary source
2- A basic principle, rule, law, or the like, that serves as the groundwork of a system; essential part.

So each and everything has its fundamentals, if we look at any subject, mathematics, physics, engineering, architecture etc. each of these subjects have a set of fundamentals, basic rules, primary source which cannot be changed and altered.

Is the following of the fundamentals and calling to the origin
Later the meaning changed and was applied to the bible thumpers who called to return to it and practice the bible when the secular movement fought to gain power and corrupted the countries.

Fundamentals of Islam or the basic principles and origins of it
1- Quran
2- Ahadith (Sunnah)
These are the primary source and the basic principle of this religion so Islamic fundamentalism means following the Quran and Sunnah. There is no such thing as extreme or moderate Islam, you either practice it as it is or you’re not.

Islamic fundamentalism, extremism, western media and the deluded

The western media and the western politicians use this term in its true meaning, in their speeches when they mentioned “Islamic fundamentals” they mean those true followers of Islam (Quran & Sunnah) and they know as long as true followers of Islam are in a nation they can’t do whatever they want. To make it sound better for their public they exaggerate it a bit and say Muslims are extremists and try to convince Muslims not to follow Islam because following Quran and Sunnah will make you a fundamentalist which means you are extremists. The truth is they know if Muslims don’t follow what is in the Quran and Sunnah they are no more Muslims. Unfortunately some of us think that this is the reality and would just be “moderate” Muslims. Well Allah sent this religion as moderate as it can be. It’s neither extreme nor easy on things it’s the fair half of everything. So when you slice this better half you’re left with a Quarter of the truth and the other 75% of filth.

Muslim brothers and sisters

Maldives has suffered a long time in a dark age where not only religious studies were in a way oppressed. But during this time the youths were taught a “version” of Islam not the Islam. There are people commenting on Islam without even knowing how to read Quran and they would read a translation and ponder. People who have absolutely no idea what Islam is and thinks it is saluting “bodufenvalhuge seedee” or visiting “medhuziyarai”. My fellow brothers and sisters it’s always good to learn and listen and study rather than just comment on your religion without even knowing it, thinking you know enough.

If you believe Islam is the true religion and Allah is the Almighty and all forgiving and Mohammed is his messenger why not correctly follow it. To follow it you need to study. Before following whatever the media is saying how about you return to your books and learn and see if the man on the street and the media are correct.

مَنْ يُطِعِ الرَّسُولَ فَقَدْ أَطَاعَ اللَّهَ وَمَنْ تَوَلَّى فَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ عَلَيْهِمْ حَفِيظًا (٨٠))النساء:80(

80. He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah. but if any turn away, we have not sent Thee to watch over their (evil deeds). (ah nisa 80)

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَقُولُوا قَوْلا سَدِيدًا (٧٠)

يُصْلِحْ لَكُمْ أَعْمَالَكُمْ وَيَغْفِرْ لَكُمْ ذُنُوبَكُمْ وَمَنْ يُطِعِ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ فَقَدْ فَازَ فَوْزًا عَظِيمًا (٧١)[الأحزاب71،70 ]

70. O ye who believe! fear Allah, and (always) say a word directed to the right:
71. that He may make your conduct whole and sound and forgive you your sins: He that obeys Allah and His Messenger, has already attained the highest achievement. [الأحزاب71،70 ]

وَمَنْ يُشَاقِقِ الرَّسُولَ مِنْ بَعْدِ مَا تَبَيَّنَ لَهُ الْهُدَى وَيَتَّبِعْ غَيْرَ سَبِيلِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ نُوَلِّهِ مَا تَوَلَّى وَنُصْلِهِ جَهَنَّمَ وَسَاءَتْ مَصِيرًا (١١٥))النساء:115(

115. and whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad) after the Right Path has been shown clearly to him, and follows other than the believers' way. we shall keep Him In the Path He has chosen, and burn Him In Hell - what an evil destination. (ah nisa 115)

إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا وَصَدُّوا عَنْ سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَشَاقُّوا الرَّسُولَ مِنْ بَعْدِ مَا تَبَيَّنَ لَهُمُ الْهُدَى لَنْ يَضُرُّوا اللَّهَ شَيْئًا وَسَيُحْبِطُ أَعْمَالَهُمْ (٣٢) )محمد 32)

32. those who reject Allah, hinder (men) from the path of Allah, and resist the Messenger, after guidance has been clearly shown to them, will not injure Allah In the least, but He (Allah) will make their deeds of no effect.(Mohammed 32)

وَلَوْلا أَنْ كَتَبَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِمُ الْجَلاءَ لَعَذَّبَهُمْ فِي الدُّنْيَا وَلَهُمْ فِي الآخِرَةِ عَذَابُ النَّارِ (٣)ذَلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ شَاقُّوا اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَمَنْ يُشَاقِّ اللَّهَ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ شَدِيدُ الْعِقَابِ (٤))الحشر (3-4

3. and had it not been that Allah had decreed banishment for them, He would certainly have punished them In This world: and In the Hereafter They shall (certainly) have the punishment of the Fire.
4. that is because They resisted Allah and His Messenger. and if any one resists Allah, Verily Allah is severe In punishment. (Al Hashr 3-4)


Thursday, March 18, 2010

Death Threats and the Freedom of Expression

Death Threats and the Freedom of Expression

Regarding An article published by an anonymous writer introducing himself as “jihad” calling for beheading Hilath. This was first addressed by the “freelance journalist” Hilath Rasheed. Several articles were written by Hilath within 24 hours before M, Nahseedh (kutti nasheed) addressed the matter and the MJA (Maldives Journalist Association) and the Maldives police force issuing a press release regarding this matter.

As I see it this is a very well planed plot by Hilath and some of his friends to create a scenario of fear within the community and to degrade a certain group of people of a certain faith. Hilath Rasheed is a person well known for his propaganda of Gay rights and anti Islamic ideologies. Years have passed and not a single government institution has condemned his works against the religion of this nation and the mockery he brought on the public of Maldives. The only excuse the government officials gave was, there was no way to prove that the website established by the name “hilath.com” was actually a property of Hilath Rasheed thus there is no way a court case can be filed on him. Yet they had no way even to close the site or to block it because all the journalists are protected by the article 27 of the constitution of Maldives (article “freedom of speech”) a bit confusing isn’t it?? Because the article states clearly that the freedom of speech should be within the boundaries of Islam. After all it’s obvious that it’s a game played by the government to change the ideology of the public. After all we have seen the internet news site that changed and gave a great deal of support for the opposition public during the reign of Maumoon and how it helped to change the point of view of a lot of people. And now we see “DO” (Dhivehi Observer) also has joined with this anti Islamic movement to promote the concept of his “home”.

Maldives journalist Association must understand and conduct their events and act within the boundaries of the constitution.

"Freedom of Expression
27. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought and the freedom to communicate opinions and expression in a manner that is not contrary to any tenet of Islam."

I believe that this association “claims” they are to make sure that the freedom established by this article is “bestowed” on all the journalists of Maldives. But it seems that some journalists are above the law. Because when they mock and attack others and their faith and the very faith of this nation, there have been no press release and action taken against them. When the institutions responsible to bring justice fail to do so, the public will try to bring justice upon their understanding even if they are wrong. So it’s the utter most stupid thing to stand to protect someone who have been attacking Islam and going against the constitution. If you (MJA) wants to protect and practice the article 27 in its full meaning than I suggest to work within the walls of it and to be a free and fair association rather than promoting a certain propaganda. The public has lost their faith and respect for this association after experiencing the double standard they have practiced. It’s a shame and guilt that shall never come to pass.

It’s very sad that that the Maldivian police falls in to a trap and portray themselves as if they are a privet company providing security for anyone who pay them. Police issuing a press release stating that they will hunt down anyone who gives out death threats and anti Islamic articles as if it’s very hard to hunt them down. There are several well known people like Ahmed Moosa (DO sappe) (the one who forgot that his ex wife had human rights..), Hilath Rasheed (gay hilath) and some teenager who claims himself to be a very concerned Maldivian while he spend his life in India and would conclude that there is no God, meaning he is not a Muslim thus making him not a Maldivian. So if the great police force of our nation wants to bring an end to these threats and peace to this nation I suggest to fully practice our constitution and to be fair in all events conducted by the police and not to promote any political propaganda.
And never was it a problem and a fear when the state minister for Islamic Affairs, Mr. Mohamed Shaheem Ali Saeed was called and given a death threat even though police confirmed it, so was the threat to Umar Naseer (hallakee umar or hallala umar). But all of a sudden Hilath and DO Sappe is very important. I wonder why?

I call upon the public not to take any information from the internet unless it is authentic with proper proof and quotes. For this is a war waged on our nation and the very foundation of our great country, to divide the people of this nation. It is very obvious if this nation is a 100% Muslim country it will be in peace and prosper and if they have united it will be very hard for “some people” to sell out this nation so they need the community to have different factions and different ideologies.

They have seen the effects of the united Muslims of this nation when they failed to allow alcohol trade, which was a great loss for them. So now they need to create a fear within the public of this nation so that the public will think it’s always because of the people practicing the religion. But isn’t it clear enough we have more youths praying and involved in moral events rather than wasting their lives, more youths work hard to earn and take care of their families and old parents rather than steal and spend it on drugs, isn’t this because of the lectures given by sheikh Ilyas, sheikh Fareedh, sheikh Shameem, sheikh Ali Zahir and all the other sheikhs. Wasn’t it the fear they had for Allah’s torment and the love they had for Allah’s paradise made them be kind to each other and take care of their parents.

Yes there are a handful of extremists in our nation, but why can’t the authorities take action against them? Ali Jaleel was known for this until his death, Mohammed Mazeed is still illegally teaching on mosques and deluding youngsters in the name of Islam the government knows this even the police know this and the police have enough information to take action against them but why haven’t they taken any action, why?? Just so that the public would think that this is what Islam is, and to create a stereotype, support it, and degrade the very belief of this nation.

Regarding Hilath, who has suffered a lot in his childhood and lost an ever so unforgettable lover, which made him portray himself as a homosexual and thinking that its religions fault that he has lost her.
I believe most children go through a stage where they suffer ASB and it depends on their environment how much they suffer this, most children who actually would get a lot of attention from their parents and family would actually suffer very little, as for the children who don’t get that much would actually seek more and more attention and may result in a life long illness. So these unfortunate children would later create a lot of trouble in the community while trying to gain as much attention possible and there are many categories of them.
The sufferer, The savior, The rescuer, The organizer, The manipulator, The mind-prisoner, The drama queen, The busy bee, The feigner, The false confessor ,The abused, The online victim and The victim.
From these categories Mr. Hilath Rasheed qualifies under the following categories.
1-The Manipulator, 2- The mind-Prisoner, 3-The drama queen, 4-The abused (which we have just seen), 5-The online victim (seen too), and of course 6-The victim.
I would suggest Mr. Hilath Rasheed and the likes of him to seek serious counseling and medical help to overcome this illness and to have a normal life.
I call upon all the Muslim brothers and sisters who are angry and upset because of these disturbed people, not to issue death threats and violent messages and to give them a chance to receive proper medical treatment and to come back to society as proud responsible citizens of this nation.
And we convey our deepest sympathy to Mr. Hilath and all like him in this sorrowful moment of failing and exposure of a well planed plot and event of realizing that they are suffering an illness. We wish you would get well very soon and overcome this disorder very soon. Thank you.


Tuesday, January 5, 2010

You can run but this just isn’t a way to get rid of your troubles

You can run but this just isn’t a way to get rid of your troubles
Sadly more and more youths are choosing drugs as a means of peace from worries and problems of their life, and with this constantly increasing number it’s hard to fight the problem and pull this small country out of this endless abyss of economic and political turmoil. Who should we blame?
Rehabilitation center and its programs seem to have failed to treat the ever so confused youths. Average age of youths coming out to the community is 16 only a handful reach for higher studies and not being 18 they are not eligible for a proper job, so they end up in the streets with more friends like them with nothing to do and lots of drugs and criminal activities to take part in. the government should seriously think of a way to occupy these youths if we want to clean our streets and make it safe and for a brighter future.



Saturday, January 2, 2010

Welcoming a new Islamic website (www.mvislamqa.com)

Welcoming a new Islamic website (www.mvislamqa.com)
It’s the birth of a new website, a website to server the Maldivian public in Dhivehi language. A website dedicated to answer Questions of the public regarding religious issues with the help of eminent scholars of Maldives and from around the world. I’m glad “mvislamqa” team came up with such a great idea and service to the people. This would make it easy for the people to ask and clear their doubts regarding religious issues and this would be an easy way to ask specific questions from specific scholars.
This shows how much the Maldivian youths are interested about their religion and how much they want to find the true path and to convey the message to the community.
I take the pleasure of thanking and conveying my gratitude to the “mvislamqa” team. جزاكم الله خيرا


Tuesday, December 15, 2009

"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Sir Winston Churchill

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
Sir Winston Churchill

It is sorrowful to stand up against the very ideology, truth and movement you fought for. It is sad to hammer the very foundations of the democracy you helped to build. But, it is bravery to stand up against evil and wrong and it is greatness to accept our own faults. No matter how much I hate to believe this, how much I refuse to listen and watch it, the truth sadly will be the truth.

The unbearable torture of 30 long years did not come to an end by the only works of MDP, nor did MDP come to reality on its own. I remember that day our beloved president Mr. Mohammed Nasheed (Anni) went on giving charity, he was running for the parliament. I remember saying it’s not your money we want, your sincerity at work. I was too young to cast a ballot back then, yet I made sure to convince people I know to vote him. Yes! I’m proud to say I’m amongst one of the first fifty members who signed for MDP in secret while Ahmed Moosa (sappe) was handling the logs. I proudly say I participated in every single demonstration organised by MDP. Even though today, sadly some of MDP’s staff would stare at me, a stare of hatred. As for them I’m a stranger against their ideology and what they believe for I criticise what I don’t see fit and I don’t nod to whatever rubbish our leader speaks of.

All I have to say to my friend who is not so dear, Mr. President, Former PM of your favourite ally said: “A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.” You very much Mr. President resembles a fanatic. Isn’t it time you stand up for the very truth you stood up at the very beginning? Isn’t it time you start thinking about our beloved nation and people? The very constitution is against of some very unacceptable propaganda you stand for now. To please you allies who fought very much to bring you onto power. Working to tear apart the very fabric that holds this nation together and to change the very simple lives of the citizens, while saying to protect them and help and guard them as prescribed by the constitution under Islamic law. Never did so mocking of fantasy obsessed the mind of our citizens. Mr. President why don’t you stop being a fanatic and change the subject of building flats every single island, and actually work on something. Mr. President why don’t you stop making a mockery out of you very coalition and work in peace with them, why not your ministries handled by your coalition members help you, without embarrassing them.

It simply sickens me to see Mr. Mohamed Nasheed and rubbish babbling Hassan Manik at his side while the ever drunken failure Zaki frisking at his tail. Yet it’s a serious joke when the double headed shaheedh playing the foreign cards after he announced the funeral of MDP. Change your mind and strategy or at least change the subject.
God bless our nation and guide our leaders to the right path, and unite us all so we shall have everlasting peace and prosper.


Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Legalizing Alcoholoic Bevareges and building places of worship for other faiths

Legalizing Alcoholoic Bevareges and building places of worship for other faiths
1- Legalizing Alcohol
Maldives is at a crisis when it comes to drugs. More that 60% of the youths are involved in drug abuse, each and every one of our nation know a drug addict or have a family member who is an addict. The former government played a lovely role in making sure the youths won’t interfere with their work and would be busy with intoxicants.
We all know we have no legal system selling drugs yet the dealers have a way to satisfy their customers. Upon this we are going to legalize the selling of Alcoholic drinks in inhabited islands other than the resorts. Even now we have foreigners selling intoxicants, legalizing Alcoholic beverages we are opening an easy door for them. This would obviously create more social problems and would result in violence. Why should we throw our self into danger? Tourists can drink at resorts if they “must”, can’t they? Shouldn’t the government concentrate on serving the citizens of this country rather than the tourists? (After all there won’t be any tourists if it wasn’t for our nation, there won’t be a nation without citizens)

2- Building places of worship for all religions

Letting other faiths build places of worship for followers of their faiths and letting other faiths practice their faith openly in Maldives. Maldives is famous for a nation of peace we are citizen of one nation with one faith under one flag, it’s sad some of us who support this idea of building places of worship for other faiths have never thought about our land and how small it is. Maldives is so small it’s not even enough for Maldivians so upon that shall we let other build their place of worship? As far as Maldivians are concerned a non-Muslim cant be a Maldivian so all the non-Muslims would be considered foreigners. Why should we let our people suffer just so that some foreigners can enjoy in our land???? . Maldivians have experienced how dangerous it is to have religious differences in any community especially in a community like ours when a terrorist attack struck Sultan Park. (It seems the current government’s ministry of Islamic affairs are doing a good job to educate people on this and stop these stupid people and their ideology corrupting our community) so what if we have others practicing their faiths openly?? No matter what we say sooner or later either we or they are going to cross the lines and it would end up in violence and bloodshed. Why not let things be as they are and foreigners can practice their faiths as they are doing it now. After all Maldives is a nation build on the basics of Islam and all laws and regulations must be based on rulings of Islam and the scholars all over the world agree for a country like Maldives, we must never allow it to happen. We have enough problems to deal with why invite more???


Monday, November 23, 2009

Intolerance and utter nonsense

Upon five years on blogging Mr.Simon shareef(and his mates) regrets opening up mv blog sphere

Upon five years on blogging Mr.Simon shareef(and his mates) regrets opening up mv blog sphere to the public in the name of freedom of thought and expression, although the real reason for this site as I see is to promote anti-Islamic barbaric atheist trends. it was a very distressing thing for me to know that the creators had an idea of promoting their propaganda in the name of freedom of expression. I congratulate Mr.Simon Shareef for his great effort on blogging even though with a hidden project.
Accusing that the blogs with an Islamic view are a team trying to take over mvblogs, unfortunately in his idea the true teaching of Islamic is extremism the ideology he promotes is moderate Islam. For your information Islam is Islam there is no extremism and moderate Islam. Islam is a complete way of life with a complete legal system. Whatever Muslims write would be based on Quran and Sunnah and would be copies of what the companions of the prophet said and wrote and the words of scholars. So a cut past of an Islamic article wouldn’t be an issue but if someone wrote something new about the religion than that’s an issue. It’s not fair to say all religious blogs cut and paste I never posted anything other than my own work based on my research but it’s sad Arabguitar ,Hilath and uwillreadnews etc cuts and pastes articles all the time and it has never been a problem. Regarding the cut and paset articles its sad on article by Siru was posted by mistake without mentioning the Author which was notified and corrected. Taking about art and science siru would be the most active art blogger in mvblogs and the community accepts him and his arts and his writing which may be hurtful for some and hard to digest.
Describing the event as an anti-organized religious activist is utter nonsense, the hit counters on these blogs prove that the community likes these blogs and they have a thirst for these writings. This proves the intolerance and the cruel truth behind Mvblogs. Simon simply cant stand to see more Islamic blogs and more people reading it abandoning the false and filthy blogs he has to offer like cutenudedudes which promotes filth against google blogger content.
What simon has written on his fifth anniversary of blogging shows how immature and intolerant he is in blogging. We (me and my brothers in Islam who write about the true teaching of Islam) tolerated the filth they kept posting and commented on them and even wrote against never called to take those blogs away from Mvblogs.


Thursday, October 29, 2009

Who is Allah?

Who is Allah?

Whenever a Muslim talks about his/her religion, it always comes to the question, who is Allah? Why aren’t he/she saying God instead of” Allah”.

Allah is the proper name applied to the one true divine God who exists necessarily by himself, whose most beautiful names describe his divine attributes. When the pagans of Mecca asked Mohammed (SAW) to describe them his (Mohammed)’s God, as they thought Allah was just another idol like they kept at their houses. Allah sent these words to Mohammed,

Say: He is Allah, the One and Only. Allah, the eternally Besought of all!. He begetteth not nor was begotten. And there is none comparable unto Him. (surat Al-Ikhlas 112: 1-4)

These verses of the Holy Quran taught the Muslims who their God is, for the unbelievers of Mecca these words taught them Allah is neither like anyone they knew nor like their false gods.
Allah further explains in the holy Quran so that it may be clear to everyone

Allah is He, than Whom there is no other god;- the Sovereign, the Holy One, the Source of Peace (and Perfection), the Guardian of Faith, the Preserver of Safety, the Exalted in Might, the Irresistible, the Supreme: Glory to Allah! (High is He) above the partners they attribute to Him. He is Allah, the Creator, the Evolver, the Bestower of Forms (or Colours). To Him belong the Most Beautiful Names: whatever is in the heavens and on earth, doth declare His Praises and Glory: and He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. (Surat Al-Hashr 59: 23-24)

He is the creator in whose hands is the disposal of all affires, Allah th omnipotent and the omniscient. Allah Says in the Holy Quran:

To Him is due the primal origin of the heavens and the earth: When He decreeth a matter, He saith to it: "Be," and it is (Surat Al-Baqarah 2: 117

Allah is wise in all actions and just in all his decrees; his justice ensures order in the universe in which nothing is out of order.

There is no god but He: That is the witness of Allah, His angels, and those endued with knowledge, standing firm on justice. There is no god but Him, the Exalted in Power, the Wise. (Surat Al-Imran 3:18)

He is the exalted Allah. glory be to him. He is far removed from every imperfection. Allah says in the Holy Quran:

Allah! There is no deity save Him, the Alive, the Eternal. Neither slumber nor sleep overtaketh Him. Unto Him belongeth whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the earth. Who is he that intercedeth with Him save by His leave? He knoweth that which is in front of them and that which is behind them, while they encompass nothing of His knowledge save what He will. His throne includeth the heavens and the earth, and He is never weary of preserving them. He is the Sublime, the Tremendous. (Surat Al-Baqarah 2:255)

To be continued ………….


Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Regarding siruart.blogspot.com copyrights issues

Regarding siruart.blogspot.com copyrights issues

I (lord hexter) legal advisor of siruarts.blogspot.com recently found out that another blogger has ripped off a caricature done by my client and edited it to fit his/her desired manner. I condemned the act and advised the blogger to remove it, because it was violating copyrights law and the user and content agreement he/she has signed upon acquiring a blogger account.
It was neither a threat nor a warning. Unfortunately some people just can’t believe the fact that it is true and it’s a bad on the other side.
Regarding Mr. Simon Shareef’s comment about this issue I would like to point out I’m not a law “student” like Simon claims. I was a practicing lawyer long before I got here. Simon just can’t stand me and he seems to base everything he writes upon his understanding assuming that it’s the correct ideology.
Regarding the matter Simon pointed out. By the time I came across the article siru posted, Simon has commented on it and also sent a text to siru not to publish the comment he made. I did appreciate what Simon did at that moment.
Regarding hate speech, anything which is reported will not be counted as hate speech for which it is not the view if the blogger. If it is most of the news agencies and news channels would be shut down.

Just because we don’t believe what some people believe that does not mean the people who could not digest our views should give a blind eye to the fact that their friend did actually violated the terms.
I’m not threatening even though some people would take it upon themselves.
Ps: someone just can’t digest the fact that his friend’s legal advisor is the very person he just can’t stand.

Lord hexter


Monday, July 13, 2009

Surprised to see MP’s who simply don’t know the constitution

7th july 2009 I’m having my breakfast while “enjoying” the peoples Majlis (Maldivian parliament). Well it’s always good to see some “paid to be very concerned about their nation” people discuss important issue, taking huge decisions and making headlines. Above all keeping people like me entertained. Little did I know this serious entertainment program was somewhat educational and in some point it would make me go through some papers to write something on my blog regarding that.

The first item on agenda was MP Abdurahim Abdullah Questioning Dr:Abdul Majid Abdul Baree, regarding import tax and Alcoholic beverages and poke . I’ve seen the few sessions of the parliament before and how the ministers would answer even long before they were telecasted. I thought this is a good chance to see how well this government has changed from the past government and how truthful Dr.majid is and how faithful to Allah and his people. There were Questions in my head he (Dr. majid would defend a government policy or may come with a legal answer which would be so twisted five to ten meanings would be in it and a layperson would have a hard time understanding it.

Five questions was forwarded by the Mp to the Minister,
1- The money generated by taxing or in any other way on alcoholic beverages and pork, would it be lawful in Shariah?
2- Is it lawful to build mosques and renovate mosques using the money generated by Alcohol and pork?
3- It’s known that a large amount of alcoholic beverages are smuggled to the public, who is responsible for this negligence?
4- Alcoholic beverages are permitted to be sold only in resorts and tourist hotels only for foreigners, do you believe the easy access to these products to public is cause the import duty on these products are low?
5- The revenue generated by selling these products goes directly into government accounts do you believe your salary and other government employs salaries are lawful?
(Translated from the minutes of 17 session on 7th July 09)
1- It would not be lawful (proved his legal ground on this statement in the light of Quran and sunnah)
2- He said no (and a few more details)
3- He said former government (few details)
4- No (understood by the statement made by the minister)
5- No cause the employees do lawful work and they do not have to bear others sins
Ok the minister said the truth with evidence on his statements, even though the Mp who forwarded the question was a bit rude to him. After that the usual majlis scenario came into play when MDP and DRP. I never thought I would see this but in this, while DRP MPs tried their very best to manipulate what the minister said to the people, MDP MPs tried to protect their minister.

The funniest thing was the very new “new, new to politics) red wave saleem (a.k. thunbulhi saleem) who actually don’t know what nizaamee nukuthaa is he always end up saying the wrong thing in the wrong position. Took a nizameenukuthaa to satisfy his need to say something stupid not knowing that he is actually mocking his religion not the minister cause the minister made statements with the evidence form Quran And Sunnah and Red wave saleem has no knowledge in that field. I was thinking to myself, haven’t this stupid puppet of DRP read the constitution or the general rules of the majlis.

Suddenly something struck my head, I couldn’t believe it, it’s so obvious yet the MPs are acting as if they don’t know it. So I checked the constitution just to make sure. It was there as it was in the old constitution. Clause 10 A, and B,

State Religion 10.
(a) The religion of the State of the Maldives is Islam. Islam shall be the one of the basis of all the laws of the Maldives

(b) No law contrary to any tenet of Islam shall be enacted in the Maldives

Section B clearly states that no law contrary to “any” tenet of Islam shall be enacted in the Maldives, the case of Alcoholic beverages and pork is known throughout this nation, even the kids know its unlawful and the minister for Islamic affairs answered the questions with clear proof that its unlawful in Islam. What else they need to know that this is contrary to Islam and thus making it illegal to be legalized in any means or to generate any kind of revenue. Why won’t any member take the famous “nizaamee nukutaa”


Saturday, July 11, 2009

A brief look at mvblogsphere titles and my thoughts

I’ve been quit busy to post anything on my blog but that didn’t stop me from checking out mvblogsphere everyday, There would be a handful of interesting titles and some a bit offending some rubbish and some very funny posts by different bloggers.

Although each and every writer is an independent individual by reading the posts some readers do get an idea that they are all linked or a group working together for their questions and doubts about Islam. Most Maldivians born as Muslims simply can’t believe that there are other Maldivians who are on the edge or against Islam, I’ve noticed this has started many cold wars in mvblogsphere.

Some with their preschool Islamic knowledge or with the classic “Maldivian Islaan dheen” would argue and point out the flaws in Islam, Others would defend their image of how Islam should be using these points. Sadly our schooling system wasn’t constructed in an appropriate manner to teach students. This vacuum was filled with all kinds of misconceptions. Some believe this is how Islam is and should be, others finds its faults and criticize Islam, while both parties do this not knowing the true teaching of Islam.

Yes it does get very confusing when someone would wear a Pakistani “kurtha” and claim that its what Muslims must wear cause it’s the “sunnah’ ignorant to the fact Mohammed was in Arabia not in Pakistan and also he (Mohammed) did not wear anything of that kind. These usually arrogant and narrow minded people also have their very own “custom made” Islam. For the if we don’t follow their rulings we are simply “kufaars”. Again blind to the fact that eminent scholars of Islam never said “this one or that one is a kafir” so ignorant to know in islam even if someone commits a crime he/she is not out of islam and repentance is there for them, and if someone commits a crime the question is always there “why he/she did it?”, was he/she aware that this is a crime?” While there would be the so called “moderate Muslims” who would say “I pray and fast so it’s ok even if I do this and that Allah is all merciful” these two ignorant to the fact that Islam is not their lamborghini or M5 to customize it as they wish .

While some Question why a person is called Sheik while he just finished first degree, well its very smple its cause former president started it to give a title to his friends, and it actually take more time to finish a degree in shariah or dauwa properly. In KSA a simple degree in shariah would cost you four years of your lives (yes just that, and the rest is paid by the Saudi government) while first degree in other subjects like “fisheries science” would be done in a year or two. Yes one more thing there are students who study in Malaysia and around the world shariah and they can do it in two years or three. Well they study “law” “how to become a lawyer” not the shariah in religious aspects.

I suggest to all those who have questions to read more and try to learn about true teachings of Islam, for those Muslims who love Islam I’d call out to control your temper cause anger is something discouraged in Islam and let people ask questions about your faith and your book, by getting mad like a bull dog wont convince people that your religion is peaceful. Its very important to say “I don’t know” if you don’t know something and direct the questioner to a more learned person thus clearing his doubts with the right information rather than your own philosophy of Islam.
Its very important for all of us to know we are not scholars so we are to pursue knowledge from them and its better to say nothing on this when we don’t have a proper education on Islam or theology, critics of different fields are actually very good at it that field thus enabling them to comment on people’s actions and point out mistakes, so to criticize a religion you are ought to know it very well and also some other religions too.


Sunday, March 15, 2009

Who taught Mohammed?

Born on the 570 AD into the pagan city of Mecca, where tribal wars and violence were frequent, burying girls alive and oppressing the weak was the culture in the Arabs. Mohammed was well known for honesty and righteousness, Muslims like myself all over the world believe he, Mohammed is the last messenger of Allah to guide mankind. There is a question I face always, why do I believe in Mohammed and how do I know he is a prophet? Here is my answer.
Answer this question and give me a name, a person, scientists, philosopher. I’d agree with you that Mohammed is not a messenger if you tell me who taught Mohammed?, except Allah.

Mohammed was an illiterate and never had any kind of education. He was brought up by his grandfather and his uncle. His beloved father passed away before he was born, his mother too while he was 6 years old. A person of this status how did he manage to come up with a book so eloquent which the best Arab Poets couldn’t show a single fault in it and not a single verse like it was produced. The holy Quran consists of 6236 ayaths (verses) in 114 surahs (chapters), Each and every verse proves Mohammed an illiterate cannot produce such a document, not even the most learned man of his time, and thus he was a messenger who had a message from the almighty Allah to deliver to the mankind.

Whenever I read the Quran and wonder whenever I go through the works of Muslim scientists, or scientists who converted just by reading Quran I ask myself this Question. “Who taught Mohammed?” the answer is always the same “Allah Almighty”.

The Quran consists of verses with scientific Knowledge which are found like yesterday with the most advanced technology.

Who taught Mohammed about the creation of the universe?
1- Big bang or Arranged so?
How Mohammed did knew that the universe formed like that? Where there any scientists at that time who had come to the conclusion of big bang?
(I personally don’t believe in big bang theory, I believe the universe was one and it was split apart and arranged by Allah. If it was an explosion it would not be in such a manner with this great order. Don’t tell me we all know explosions create chaos and a mess.)
The Quran says:
أَوَلَمْ يَرَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقًا فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا ۖ وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاءِ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ ۖ أَفَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ) سورة الأنبيا(30
“Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then we parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe?” (21:30)

The Quran says about the rotation of the planets and their axis.
وَالشَّمْسُ تَجْرِي لِمُسْتَقَرٍّ لَّهَا ۚ ذَ‌ٰلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ ) سورة يس (38
” And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term (appointed). That is the Decree of the All-Mighty, the All-Knowing. (36:38)
وَالْقَمَرَ قَدَّرْنَاهُ مَنَازِلَ حَتَّىٰ عَادَ كَالْعُرْجُونِ الْقَدِيمِ ) سورة يس (39
And the moon, we have measured for it mansions (to traverse) till it returns like the old dried curved date stalk. (36:39)
(thafseer why it is said “till it returns like the odd dried curved date stalk”, And the moon We have determined it, with respect to its course, [to run] in phases — twenty eight phases in twenty eight nights of every month; it becomes concealed for two nights when the month has thirty days, and for one night when it has twenty nine days — until it returns, during its final phase seeming to the [human] eye, like an aged palm-bough, in other words, like the stalk with a date cluster when it ages, becoming delicate, arched and yellowish.

لَا الشَّمْسُ يَنبَغِي لَهَا أَن تُدْرِكَ الْقَمَرَ وَلَا اللَّيْلُ سَابِقُ النَّهَارِ ۚ وَكُلٌّ فِي فَلَكٍ يَسْبَحُونَ) سورة يس (40
It is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor does the night outstrip the day. They all float, each in an orbit” (36:40)”
How did Mohammed know that sun is at a fixed course and it rotates on its axis? How did Mohammed know that each and every planet has its own axis? Who told him or taught him that 1400 years back?

Expanding Universe
Quran says:
وَالسَّمَاءَ بَنَيْنَاهَا بِأَيْدٍ وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ) سورة الذاريات(47
“We have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is we who are steadily expanding it.... ” (51:47)
It was only in 1929 that Edwin Hubble discovered the Universe is expanding, so how on earth did Mohammed know it 1400 years ago? Who taught Mohammed cosmic science?

Stars and planets
Quran says:
وَالنَّجْمِ إِذَا هَوَىٰ)سورة النجم (1
By the star when it goes down, (or vanishes).(53:1)
How did Mohammed knew that when stars die they lose their light and it’s a gaseous body unlike other planets and moons and described them breaking into pieces?

About the sun
Quran says:
إِذَا الشَّمْسُ كُوِّرَتْ) سورة التكوير (1
When the sun Kuwwirat (wound round and lost its light and is overthrown) (81:1)
How did Mohammed know that the sun is not round which scientists discovered it on 2008 and when it loses its power it would be round?

The Protective Atmosphere
Earth is constantly bombarded by meteoroids that disintegrate upon the atmosphere and by lethal rays emitted by the sun. This UV radiation is absorbed by the Ozone layer forming the outer fringe of our atmosphere. Thus our atmosphere along with its Ozone layer is a protective covering for us. Life possibly could not have existed without it. How meticulously, does our Lord sustain and protect us against this atmospheric destruction.
Quran says:
وَجَعَلْنَا السَّمَاءَ سَقْفًا مَّحْفُوظًا ۖ وَهُمْ عَنْ آيَاتِهَا مُعْرِضُونَ ) سورة الأنبياء (32
"And We have made the atmosphere a protective roof, yet do they turn away from the Signs which these things point to." (21:32)
Yes, how did he know that?

The Dutch naturalist Anthony van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) produced lenses powerful enough to prove that many tiny creatures are not spontaneously generated but are produced from eggs. The science of Embryology as we know it today did not discover many of the detailed aspects of human embryonic development until the 1970s, using powerful microscopes, ultra sound and fiber optics technology. See how the Quran described the stages of embryonic development.
Quran says:
خَلَقَ الْإِنسَانَ مِن نُّطْفَةٍ فَإِذَا هُوَ خَصِيمٌ مُّبِينٌ) سورة النحل(4
"God fashioned man from a small quantity (of sperm)" (16:4)
Fertilization takes place with only one sperm among several tens of million produced by man.
ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَاهُ نُطْفَةً فِي قَرَارٍ مَّكِينٍ) سورة المؤمنون(13
"Then We placed him as a drop in a place of rest" (23:13)
Implantation of the blastocyst in the uterus.
ثُمَّ خَلَقْنَا النُّطْفَةَ عَلَقَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْعَلَقَةَ مُضْغَةً فَخَلَقْنَا الْمُضْغَةَ عِظَامًا فَكَسَوْنَا الْعِظَامَ لَحْمًا ثُمَّ أَنشَأْنَاهُ خَلْقًا آخَرَ ۚ فَتَبَارَكَ اللَّهُ أَحْسَنُ الْخَالِقِينَ) سورة المؤمنون (14
"Then We made the drop into a leech like structure..." (23:14)
This resemblance of the human embryo to a leech is an appropriate description of the human embryo from days 7-24, when it clings to the endometrium of the uterus.
ثُمَّ سَوَّاهُ وَنَفَخَ فِيهِ مِن رُّوحِهِ ۖ وَجَعَلَ لَكُمُ السَّمْعَ وَالْأَبْصَارَ وَالْأَفْئِدَةَ ۚ قَلِيلًا مَّا تَشْكُرُونَ) سورة السجدة (9
"And He (God) gave you hearing and sight and feeling and understanding." (32:9)
The internal ears appear before the eyes, and the brain (the sight of understanding) differentiates last.
Dr. E. Marshall Johnson [2] Professor of Anatomy, concluded after studying verses from Quran: "The Quran describes not only the development of external form but emphasizes also the internal stages - the stages inside the embryo of its creation and development, emphasizing major events recognized by contemporary science... so I see nothing in conflict with the concept that divine intervention was involved..."
Same old question, how did Mohammed know that?

Gender Determination
The concept of "Gender Determination" as being described by geneticists, is one of the outstanding information revealed to us in the Quran. This information is now a known fact, that sperms are the deciding factors in determining the type of gender (male or female) in the new embryo. This determination through the male sperm is due to the fact that sperms have an X and Y chromosomes, while the female ovum has only X Chromosomes (X, X). Through the Quran, The Almighty informs us that it is the male sperms that determine the type of gender for the new offspring:
أَيَحْسَبُ الْإِنسَانُ أَن يُتْرَكَ سُدًى * أَلَمْ يَكُ نُطْفَةً مِّن مَّنِيٍّ يُمْنَىٰ * ثُمَّ كَانَ عَلَقَةً فَخَلَقَ فَسَوَّىٰ * فَجَعَلَ مِنْهُ الزَّوْجَيْنِ الذَّكَرَ وَالْأُنثَىٰ ) سورة القيامة (39-36
"Does man think that he will be left uncontrolled (without purpose)? Was he not a drop of sperm emitted (in humble form)? Then did (God) make and fashion (him) in due proportion. And of him He made two sexes, male and female..." (75:36-39)
Yes, how did he know that?

And there are more where that came from, dozens of scientists have converted to Islam after going through Quran, understanding it would take a divine inspiration to come up with a book of this magnitude. Still the Question remains if Mohammed wrote that book or made it up, how on earth did he know those scientific facts?
Allah says in the Quran:
سَنُرِيهِمْ آيَاتِنَا فِي الْآفَاقِ وَفِي أَنفُسِهِمْ حَتَّىٰ يَتَبَيَّنَ لَهُمْ أَنَّهُ الْحَقُّ ۗ أَوَلَمْ يَكْفِ بِرَبِّكَ أَنَّهُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ شَهِيدٌ
(سورة فصلت 53)
We shall show them our portents on the horizons and within themselves until it will be manifest unto them that it is the Truth. Doth not thy Lord suffice, since He is Witness over all things? (41:53)



Wednesday, February 25, 2009


Millions of people before us have asked the very same questions we now ask ourselves. Who am I?, where do I come from?, How did the world and the universe come into being?, what will happen to us when we die?. These questions of life, meaning and the purpose of life have forced people of knowledge and reason to think study and answer them. This resulted in different ideologies and theories. One of these theories is Atheism. Atheism or godless was originated in ancient Greek, Diagoras of Melos was the first person to be recorded as an atheist. He lived in the 5th century BC. Though it’s said scientists and philosophers are atheists, this does not mean every scientist or philosopher don’t believe in God (even though Peter Atkins call those believing scientists “half scientists”) Yet the early Atheists had very different thinking than the modern ideology of atheism which is based on Charles Darwin’s “origin of species “. The idea of denying God’s existence, and the claim of “everything can be explained by science” and of cause “the big bang” and “Evolution”, is now known as Atheism. Though the word atheism means godless this does not mean every atheist don’t believe in a god or a “supernatural force”, they are called weak atheism, if its strong atheism the belief in gods and supernatural entities are denied.

Though atheism denounces Christianity, Islam and all other religions and claim they do not follow a religion, Atheism itself has got those characteristics of a religion itself. Atheism has got its own God, prophets, book, disciples, evangelists calling to Atheism and yes the main factor in every religion the faith in things we have no proof on it or belief .(yes they do have it. I’ll come to that a bit later).

Whatever religion the followers would believe in their God or gods to be the creator and the maintainer of this great realm and through God they can explain everything in the universe. Like so Atheist believe that science is the answer to each and every question. Like all religions agree God sent prophets to guide mankind and convey Gods message, well Atheists do have it too, while Charles Darwin is the Moses of Atheism, Richard Dawkins seems to be the messiah, the savior of mankind and to deliver mankind from the darkness and blind following of religions to the “right path” of science. Well the book of Darwin “the origin of species” is the Old Testament of Atheism while the book by Dawkins “God delusion” is the New Testament thus completing the Atheist bible. In Dawkins “God delusion” he brings out the new “ten commandants” which should have been in the Old Testament. Then there are those faithful disciples who are so good in their faith they do not reason and ask if anyone has actually seen “evolution” or even reasonably proved it, they believe it’s perfect and can be proved and tries to prove it over and over again, while turning away from the fact that there are fossils disproving Evolution. What about the big bang? Rocky Kolb a leading scientist in Fermilab said while explaining particle collision “when they (particles) collide they produce the same conditions we believe would be present a millionth of a millionth of a second after the big bang” well Dawkins says “science has standards of testing things have to be verified it’s not enough to somebody to say, I believe, so and so “. So who should we follow?

Darwin’s “the origin of species”

Well we all know simply what the evolution theory is, so I would not waste any time trying to explain it. I’m going to point out the scientific faults and flaws of the theory know so far. The fifteen flaws of Darwin’s theory which I’m about to present to you are the conclusion of the research conducted by the famous writer Harun Yahya.

"1 The False Claim of Whales' Terrestrial Ancestor:
The subject of the fictitious forebear of whales is a terrible embarrassment for Darwinists. Contemporary Darwinists have long tried to eliminate that embarrassment by concealing the claim that "bears fishing on the sea shore gradually turned into whales." But their own suggestions were little different to that of Darwin's. Darwinists despairingly attempted to portray the ear and tooth structure of a living thing no bigger than a raccoon as evidence of this impossible and fictitious transition. The fact is that this is a classic Darwinist tactic. By pointing to anatomical similarities between different life forms, Darwinists attempted to establish a relationship between a totally unconnected land dweller and a marine mammal. But they were unable even to mention the evidence that would confirm this mythical transition, in other words the subject of transitional forms. They cannot do so because like all Darwinists' other claims, this is a lie, and THERE IS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM TO SUBSTANTIATE IT.”

“2 The Transition from Water to Dry Land Deceit:
For years, Darwinists portrayed a well-known fossil fish as evidence of their myth of the transition from water to dry land. Described as the best known transitional fossil, the Coelacanth was depicted as a perfect example of that transition from water to land. According to the Darwinist myth, the creature had fins that turned into feet and was developing a lung. However, A LIVING COELACANTH was discovered in the sea in 1938. Darwinists could no longer lie about the Coelacanth. For example, the structures they had for years described as a primitive lung was nothing more than an OIL SAC. The structures they heralded as primitive legs were in fact PERFECT FINS. This life form, alleged to be on the brink of moving from the water to dry land, was in fact a BOTTOM-DWELLING FISH that inhabited depths of 180 meters and that immediately died when brought up into shallower waters. More than 300 other LIVING SPECIMENS have subsequently been caught.

The Darwinist speculation regarding the Tiktaalik was no different to that concerning the Coelacanth. The Tiktaalik, a creature with a mosaic character (containing perfect structures from different life forms), is an exceedingly complex life form with well preserved fossil remains. But its characteristics display no transitional features. Each one is a fully developed, perfect structure found in mosaic life forms (such as the platypus). The sole reason for the Darwinist conjecture around the animal is that they interpret the fossil remains of this extinct mosaic form in the light of their own preconceptions. Just as with the Coelacanth.

The absence of a single transitional form in the myth of the transition from water to dry land, not to mention such a transition being anatomically and physiologically impossible, is alone sufficient to repudiate the claims on the subject.”

“3 The Evolution of Feathers Deceit:
Darwinists ignore one very important fact as they espouse the myth of a transition from land to the air. The 100 million fossils they kept hidden away have now been brought out into the daylight, and these contain perfect flying birds that were contemporary with Archaeopteryx. People have personally examined the 125-million-year-oldLIAONINGORNIS fossil and the 120-million-year-old CONFUCIUSORNIS fossil. And that is why they now laugh at deceptions such as "Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil" or "Epidexipteryx, discovered more recently, was the ancestor of birds."

All the claims regarding Archaeopteryx have long since been discredited. It has been realized that the animal was a bird capable of perfect flight, and that its teeth and claws are structures also found in contemporary birds.”

“4 The Evolution of Teeth Deceit:
The way that Nature magazine and Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik are able to carry the claim that teeth evolved and to cite a study performed on the molar teeth of mice is quite amazing. All living things have their own unique characteristics. Their anatomical structures are therefore different to one another. It is perfectly natural for mice to have genetic sequences different to those of other rodents. This is evidence, not that they evolved, but that the life forms in question were specially created for their habitants and living conditions. All living things possess, by Allah's will, the most perfect equipment and structures. In order to portray this as evidence of evolution, Darwinists need to produce transitional fossils revealing the supposed development of these structures. But not a single intermediate form fossil exists. That means this claim is nothing more than Darwinist demagoguery.”

“5 The Evolution of the Vertebrate Skeleton Deceit:
The explanation in the report is literally this: "The neural crest, the existence of which is known only in embryos, explains why vertebrates have different skull and facial structures. But it is impossible to indicate the evolutionary history of the neural crest through fossil evidence because of the lack of embryonic data.

It is inexplicable how something for which there is no fossil evidence, as openly admitted in the article, can be depicted as evidence for supposed evolution. The neural crest in the human embryo is a magnificent structure. Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik made do with describing the perfection of the structure in question and was also obliged to admit that there were no evolutionary races belonging to it in the fossil record. This is a blatant confession that evolution never happened and that living things are created with all their immaculate structures.”

“6 The Speciation Deceit:
Members of a species always reproduce with members of the same species in nature. And various characteristics in members of a species arising due to environmental factors or present in the genes, may come to predominate in subsequent generations. In the same way that tallness may predominate in the children of one tall and one short individual. But this change arising in subsequent generations cannot turn living things into another species. Darwin's finches developed longer or shorter beaks, but they never became other life forms. They did not turn into peacocks or bats. In the example in the article, sticklebacks did not give rise to a new species by reproducing one another. Sticklebacks anosticklebacks and have acquired no new features apart from those arising from their own genes. No matter how much Darwinists attempt to mislead people by the use of variations, this very definitely constitutes no evidence for evolution.”

“7 The Natural Elimination Is Evolution Deceit:
Ever since Darwin's day, natural elimination has been put forward as Darwinists' most favored supposed evolutionary mechanism. But it is actually a terrible lie. Existing information in a living thing's genes may give rise to various anatomical changes on account of environmental factors. But these changes never turn one life form into another. They never bestow any new organs or structures on it. The fact that lizards' tails shorten due to environmental factors is no evidence of evolution.”

“8 The Simultaneous Evolution Deceit:
Simultaneous evolution is another deceptive concept employed by Darwinists. The article in question contained a scenario regarding the supposed evolution of bacteria and parasites. The interesting thing is that bacteria that existed as far back as 3.6 billion years ago are still bacteria, and their parasites are still parasites. For some reason, no changes took place in the life forms in question during this supposed evolution, and no evolution ever happened. These single-cell organisms that should, according to Darwinists' claims, have developed and turned into fish, mammals and even human beings, are exactly the same now as they were 3.5 billion years ago. Because, like all other life forms, these creatures are entities created by Allah, out of nothing. And they were created with the same appearance 3.5 billion years ago as that they are created with today.”

“9 The Evolutionary Variation Deceit:
What Darwinists keep trying to depict as evidence for evolution, albeit under different names and with different examples, is always the same thing: variations. Darwinists attempt to distort variations within a species and portray them as instances of evolution. But this is a lie. The fact that the great tits considered in the article possess different structural features in different regions represents no advantage for the theory of evolution. In order to be evidence for evolution, the birds in question would have had to have developed new structures not belonging to them, such as arms or fins. But that is impossible. These life forms change within the bounds of the information contained in their genes, as happened in the instance cited in the paper. For that reason, certain genes becoming dominant within certain genetic structures in living things is simply variation and represents to evidence for evolution.”

“10 The Evolution of the Lepistes Surviving through Natural Elimination Deceit:
The way that the Lepistes fish in the article survived because of their different colors when subjected to natural elimination is no evidence of evolution. The fact a life form survives through natural elimination does not cause it to evolve. Therefore, the gradual elimination of lepistes of different colors did not bestow any new characteristics on them. Elimination of living things because of physical characteristics has no other outcome than an increase in the numbers of lepistes of some colors and a reduction in the numbers of the others. That will remain the case even over millions of years. The idea that natural elimination is an evolutionary mechanism is an entirely fictitious one.”

“11 The Depicting Proofs of Creation As Evidence of Evolution Deceit:
One technique employed by Darwinists is to describe the glorious characteristics of living things and then maintain that these are a miracle of so-called evolution. The magnificent hunting characteristics of the Moray eel are described in the same way in the article and the same method then employed. The animal's perfect anatomical structure, and its thin body ideally suited to its hunting technique are described in detail and then, inexplicably and with no supporting evidence of any kind, ascribed to so-called evolution. The fact is that this immaculate structure proves that the creatures were created of nothing, together with all its features. There are also fossil records that show that the eel was created together with all these superior features and has remained unchanged for all the millions of years since. 95-million-year-old eel fossils demolish all evolutionist claims. Darwinists' demagogic accounts devoid of any evidence at all merely humiliate them in the face of this obvious truth.”

“12 The Deceit of Depicting Variation in Finch Beaks as Proof of Evolution Ever Since Darwin's Time:
Finches may have different shaped beaks within the same species. That state of affairs may also apply to other life forms. But the important thing – as stated earlier – is that these changes within a species already exist within the genes. These animals have possessed that information since they were first created. The differences in their beaks did arise as a result of information added to their genes subsequently. Finches will undergo variation to the extent that differences exist in their genes. It is impossible for beaks to assume any shape not already in finches' genes or to turn into any other organ.

All the examples that Darwinists have cited of speciation are deceptions. No finches have ever turned into an eagle or a bat, a mammal. No finch beak has ever turned into a terrestrial mammal's nose. These animals have never undergone any evolutionary change at all. It is a lie to claim that changes in beaks are the result of information added to the genes. It is impossible for information to be added to living things' genes in random processes and for this to bestow any advantage on an organism or develop into any new organ, and such a thing has never happened.”

“13 Microevolution and Macroevolution Are Deceptions:
Evolutionists refer to variation within a species as "microevolution" and to the hypothesis of the formation of new species as "macroevolution," both of which are illusory processes. But the whole thing is a lie.

1) The process known as microevolution never happened. All the examples that Darwinists cite as evidence for microevolution are in fact variations arising within a species. But variations are not evolution. An insect developing resistance to pesticides, finch beaks assuming different shapes or cows living on different continents being more or less hairy are the result of the perfect systems created within their genes. These life forms never acquired any characteristic from nowhere, and never evolved.

2) Neither did the illusory process known as macroevolution ever take place. Darwinists are lying when they claim that fossils representing evidence for macroevolution have been discovered. They possess not a single transitional form fossil. According to Darwinists, there should be billions or even trillions of fossils to verify this claim. Yet 100 million fossils have so far been unearthed. They have all been closely examined, BUT NOT A SINGLE ONE IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSIL. Darwinists' claim that we can see evidence for macroevolution in the structure of genes is a second great lie. Indeed, because they have no evidence to support this idea, Darwinists attempt to explain it away with such demagogic and diplomatic expressions as "evolution may have had a great effect on genes."

Genes are extraordinarily complex and magnificent structures that have been operating perfectly since the moment they were first created. Even a single DNA, the smallest part of these structures, is a major challenge to Darwinists. Darwinism is a theory that has collapsed on both the molecular and paleontological levels.”

“14 The Resistance to Poisons Is Evidence of Evolution Deceit:
Living things are created with glorious characteristics. The structures in their bodies and what happens in them are breathtaking. Darwinists, however, generally take these structures and include them in evolutionary fairy tales. But in doing so THEY HAVE NOT A SINGLE MOLECULAR FINDING OR FOSSIL REMAIN to act as evidence for this fictitious evolution.

The clams cited in this section are miracles of creation with their resistance to the toxin known as saxitoxin. Darwinists are unable to explain how these organism came to possess this extraordinary system, and it is impossible for them ever to do so. Because as with all living things' structures, this is extraordinarily complex and totally refutes the theory of evolution. It is also a miracle how another member of the same species should lack this immunity because it lives in a toxin-free region. Almighty Allah has created these organisms in the most appropriate manner for their surroundings. In order for Darwinists to be able to depict this as evidence for Darwinism, they need to show how the illusory evolutionary processes concerned took place, and what their supporting evidence is.

The idea that "clams have different properties in different habitats, and this is the result of evolution" might once have deceived primary school children, but even they can no longer be taken in by it.”

“15 The Attempt to Suggest Evolution with Scenarios of Evolutionary Resistance Deceit:
Since evolution is a false theory, Darwinists have a constant need to develop tactics for their propaganda. They always ascribe molecular discoveries to the theory of evolution. But rather than admitting that evolution is a lie, they keep trying to adapt new findings to it. They always depict new fossil discoveries as evidence against evolution. Rather than giving up in the absence of any transitional fossils, Darwinists try to gloss over it. As we have seen, what Darwinists do is to keep developing new tactics in the face of discoveries that repudiate evolution, rather than coming up with any proof. Darwinism is founded, not on finding and submitting evidence, but on thinking up new tactics and demagoguery. And demagoguery is essential for Darwinists, BECAUSE THEIR THEORY IS DEVOID OF ANY EVIDENCE.

One tactic is developed in section 15 of the Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik article, with an amazing attempt to portray fossils that refute evolution as evidence for it. There are millions of living fossils in the world. The crocodiles, deer, bears, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, and in short all living things in the fossil record have the same appearances and anatomies as they did when they were first created. Allah has miraculously preserved them with the same appearances they had millions of years in the past. So much so that Darwinists can never gloss over the reality of living fossils.

That is why Darwinists admit the existence of living fossils but try to interpret their emergence according to their own lights. The best known example of this is the idea that life forms can remain unaltered for millions of years but then undergo sudden changes (punctuated evolution). This huge deception, based on the logic of "how can we adapt the fossil record to evolution?" has been imposed on Darwinists by the way fossils repudiate evolution. Because living things really have remained unchanged for millions of years, although the Darwinist concept of sudden changes is a lie. There is not the slightest trace of such great changes in the fossil record. Such changes cannot be tested, observed or explained. There are no traces anywhere in the world or under the ground of such momentous changes. Allah created living things millions of years ago with the same appearances they have today. The idea of sudden change is, like the theory of evolution itself, a terrible lie.”

Who believe in Evolution now?

British daily The Guardian conducted a survey on Evolution, it emerged that only 25% of the Britons believed in Evolution. So goes the results throughout Europe.
“92% of people in a poll on the French scientific web site Science Actualités REJECT DARWINISM, 86% of people in a survey on the German daily Die Welt web site REJECT DARWINISM, 88% of people in a poll in the Danish daily Ekstra Bladet web site REJECT DARWINISM, 87% of people in a survey on the German daily Süddeutsche Zeitung web site and 85% of people in a poll on the Swiss paper Blick web site REJECT DARWINISM.”
This proves that Humans have knowledge of true science to reject the belief that they evolved from a simpler form to a more complex form.

Darwinism Father of racism

One of the most important yet least-known aspects of Darwin is his racism: Darwin regarded white Europeans as more “advanced" than other human races. While Darwin presumed that man evolved from ape-like creatures, he surmised that some races developed more than others and that the latter still bore simian features. In his book, The Descent of Man, which he published after The Origin of Species, he boldly commented on "the greater differences between men of distinct races".1 In his book, Darwin held blacks and Australian Aborigines to be equal to gorillas and then inferred that these would be "done away with" by the "civilized races" in time. He said: At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes... will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. Darwin's nonsensical ideas were not only theorized, but also brought into a position where they provided the most important "scientific ground" for racism. Supposing that living beings evolved in the struggle for life, Darwinism was even adapted to the social sciences, and turned into a conception that came to be called "Social Darwinism". Social Darwinism contends that existing human races are located at different
Rungs of the "evolutionary ladder” that the European races were the most "advanced" of all, and that many other races still bear "simian" features

Each and every religion believes that humans hold a greater value but Darwin brought man down to the level of Animal, which gave born for many disturbing ideas and theories. The fist and the hardest to deny (scientifically) is the theory brought up by Darwin’s half cousin Francis Galton “eugenics” he was directly inspired by Darwin’s “the origin of species” It’s a very disturbing theory which was practiced by Hitler and Stalin. The interesting thing about Eugenics is that the atheists just don’t want to talk about it, just like the famous Documentary maker Rod little says “why not? What is the matter boys? Scientifically after all it is very difficult to argue against,” this idea which gave birth to communism and others secular ideas.

It’s obvious that Darwin’s theory is just an imagination thought up. People, who really reason, think and search for knowledge would know the abundance of proof against Evolution and the Atheist philosophy prove that these two ideologies are just myths and misguidance.

“The Trouble with Atheism” documentary by Rod liddle
God delusion by Dawkins
Origin of species by Darwin
Harun Yahya’s work

the images used are drawings by siru www.siruart.blogspot.com